Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B V Babu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. NACADEMIC/NPROF appear to be met. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:45, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

B V Babu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable but both speedy and PROD have been removed. Seems to be paid. Jerod Lycett (talk) 17:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:43, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:43, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. North America1000 18:43, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Comment. The subject most likely probably passes WP:PROF of all of the info given in the article checks out, but the article is currently written in such a way that I am sorely tempted to tag it WP:CSD. Nsk92 (talk) 19:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Looking at that, I think we'd need an expert. I don't know if he's made significant impact in his field or in higher education. I'm not sure his only notable award is prestigious, let alone highly prestigious, but do not think so. Basically the question is down to, the significant impact part. Jerod Lycett (talk) 20:42, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof on GS citations. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:31, 18 September 2016 (UTC).
 * Keep perhaps somehow, as any paid claims can be taken care by other paths, but the chancellor position itself is enough to convince us an article. SwisterTwister   talk  22:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep: Meets WP:NACADEMIC.  ..an h-index of 36 and i10-index of 82 and over 5225 citations . Source: Google Scholar. Anup   [Talk]  03:54, 22 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.