Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baarish (song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Baarish (song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing specifically covering this song.All covg. in general film-song reviews.Singular coverage lonely in promotional writings(The HT article).The critical reception section writes reviews of the songs but WP:NSONGS says ... Coverage of a song in the context of an album review does not establish notability. If the only coverage of a song occurs in the context of reviews of the album on which it appears, that material should be contained in the album article and an independent article about the song should not be created...; which is what is happening here.Redirect asnd/or Merge to film article sought. Winged Blades Godric 17:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: WP:RS not met.-Umair Aj (talk) 17:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:43, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep- For general information more than 80 percent of notable song from India mostly in Hindi are from Bollywood films, because contrary to North America, India doesn't have a separate independent music sponsoring music industry of its own, so of course doesn't matter how much is the notbility of a song, a film associated with it will always get mentioned. Please don't delete, you can verify it's notability from the web and citations given. It is one of the very notable song in India of this year.Anoptimistix (talk) 19:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Anoptimistix (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD.
 * Merge & Redirect is accepted if the any respected administrators feel the article is not notable Anoptimistix (talk) 20:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep as the critical reception section of the article shows reviews by reliable sources such as Times of India, DNA and India.com for WP:GNG Atlantic306 (talk) 14:56, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep appears to meet GNG. Artw (talk) 23:09, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment--Typical WP:MILL covg.How can't this be adequately covered at the film article? Winged Blades Godric 03:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -  The   Magnificentist  15:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep because it has got adequate covering through various articles and also on you tube. This being a very famous Indian ( Bollywood ) Song requires to have its own Wikipedia page and must not be considered for deletion. Let us all rather work on its expansion. I also request that this article may be excluded from AfD list and this discussion be concluded. Thanks. Red Pen (talk) 19:42, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
 * For one, Youtube fails WP:RS.And I fail to see much policy in your argument(s).And we are talking about notability; not assumed popularity(on youtube view/like counts etc.)! Winged Blades Godric 10:38, 23 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.