Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bab Successor Letter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. I discounted all the "delete and merge" votes as that is not a valid action. Deathphoenix ʕ 16:42, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Bab Successor Letter

 * Delete and merge - Anything valuable here is already covered on other pages, namely Bahá'í/Bábí split, and Bábís. Merge it into Bahá'í/Bábí split — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cunado19 (talk • contribs)


 * AfD is not for suggesting merges. Royal Blue   T / C  04:16, 15 February 2006 (UTC)


 * This is a new page, we are far from over with it. This is just the first salvo in the war.  Merging it into any other page will just make that page grow beyond any usefulness. Wjhonson 03:50, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge - Agree with sentiment above. This is part of a much larger subject and leaving it as a stand-alone document would leave it not much more than a stub. MARussellPESE 04:25, 9 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete and merge - Agree with MARusselPESE -- Jeff3000 05:07, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and merge per all of the above. ¡Dustimagic!  ( T / C )

Please remember that if anything is merged, the edit history needs to be retained as well to comply with the GFDL. Therefore, deleting the edit history while keeping the material is not a valid vote. - Mgm|(talk) 11:13, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' 'Delete and merge' is not a valid vote. - ulayiti (talk)  11:55, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

AfD is not for proposing merges, and, having proposed a merge, you certainly cannot then delete the history. Given that the only "delete"rs also want it merged, this is probably a prime candidate for delisting. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 12:17, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete. The letter and the existence of multiple versions is already covered in the first chapter of Bahá'í/Bábí split. This article appears to be an abbreviated version of that. As it is, this article lacks context, and adding it would just make the two articles even closer copies of each other. Weregerbil 13:59, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as per Weregerbil. -- Jeff3000 14:01, 24 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete content and redirect - as above Cuñado  [[image:Bahai star.svg|20px]] -  Talk  01:28, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per Weregerbil. This topic is already covered better there. This is just a stub. MARussellPESE 13:44, 27 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.