Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baba Kundan Das Maharaj Ji Temple Sihali Kalan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 23:06, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Baba Kundan Das Maharaj Ji Temple Sihali Kalan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to be an article about a temple, with no evidence of notability, but is so badly written that it is not possible to retrieve any useful information from it. Optimist on the run (talk) 08:00, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 08:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 08:57, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:BLOWITUP - poorly written and completely non-compliant with WP:MoS that a copyedit is impossible.  Dr Strauss   talk  19:29, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Reasoning primarily on essay "BLOWITUP" is invalid, because among other reasons it is acknowledging the validity of the topic.  See new counter-essay wp:BLOWUPBLOWITUP. -- do  ncr  am  06:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * My reason for nomination is not based on WP:BLOWITUP, but on the notability of the subject, given that there is nothing in the article, nor can I find anything on Google. Is your keep !vote based purely on your opposition to the essay, or do you have some evidence of notability? If you do please add it to the article. Optimist on the run (talk) 08:38, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - nomination is ill-presented, in that there IS enough retrievable information there for a stub (it is admittedly badly written: that's easily fixable and since when was it a reason to delete?). I'll deal with that myself presently. On notability, there is likely to be more information available in Indian-language sources, even if not in an Eng-lang search on Google, so Keep, at least for now. Eustachiusz (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've tidied it into a stub. For the rest, while I'm not exactly eating my words I'm starting to look at them on the plate - difficult to find anything useful. Perhaps the best place for this would be in an article on the village. Eustachiusz (talk) 19:12, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I've now created a stub for the village, where a one-sentence mention of the temple sits OK, so perhaps a redirect is in order. Also, however, Baba KJM looks as though it may be another name for Prem Rawat, which might give this set-up more interest than it might have otherwise. No, not so - my mistake.Eustachiusz (talk) 03:33, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry - I moved the page without thinking to Baba Kundan Das Maharaj Ji Temple, Sihali Kalan . Eustachiusz (talk) 03:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 01:31, 17 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:41, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment - despite the re-write, there are still no reliable sources about this article, nor is there any reference in Google. Optimist on the run (talk) 07:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Unsourced even after Eustachiusz's yeoman (or yeowoman) work. Simply nothing to go on here, except (presumably) the personal knowledge of the article creator, which isn't WP:V.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 19:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.