Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baba Teja Nath


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Baba Teja Nath

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unable to find any source or references about this saint. Doesn't pass WP:GNG.

, Read the Legends section The villagers of Kirthal relate several legends about Baba Teja Nath:
 * Once Baba Teja Nath was sitting with his disciples and he suddenly started laughing, after a disciple asked him for the reason for his laughter he said that in a fair held of the bank of river Ganga a tightrope walker was performing an act and in the middle of the rope his trousers came loose and everyone present at the fair started laughing so Baba also laughed. Later that day when the villagers who went for Ganga Snan returned to the village the disciples told him the story that Baba told them earlier that day while sitting with them and whether it is true or not, the villager said that it is completely true and Baba was standing beside the villager when the event occurred. It is said that Baba Teja Nath was present at two locations simultaneously.
 * Once some holy scholars from Haryana to Haridwar going through Kirthal in midway for meeting Baba Teja Nath. When they arrived it was raining heavily accompanied with thunderstorm and hail. The scholars became jitter and started escaping into nearby houses. In reply to this Baba Teja Nath shouted at them and told them that he has drawn a line on the ground and they should come inside the area of the line. All the scholars obeyed him and once they were inside the area of the line they saw that the area was completely free from the thunderstorms and not a single drop of rain fell in that area.'' Marvellous Spider-Man  14:09, 29 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Marvellous Spider-Man, will you please read what Criteria for speedy deletion actually says before you tag any more articles for deletion? There is absolutely zero likelihood that this topic was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, which is the sole criterion for whether something is deletable under A11. (Aside from anything else, it's been mentioned in the parent article for over two years.) Speedy deletion is nothing to do with notability. &#8209; Iridescent 14:29, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:20, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No sources to indicate notability. No longer a penguin (talk) 12:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete No third party WP:RS that justify content or notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.