Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babaji ka thullu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. --Cerebellum (talk) 03:23, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Babaji ka thullu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD removed with no removal rationale. Reason was "Pure WP:OR". Fiddle  Faddle  11:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete looks like a joke page. Concept is known but it is not notable enough for a wikipedia page.-- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 13:35, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment There is no suitable speedy deletion category, or, trust me, I would have volunteered it for it. Fiddle   Faddle  13:47, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NEOLOGISM which states, "Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull together many facts about a particular term and show evidence of its usage on the Internet or in larger society. To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." If such secondary sources are written or found, we can reconsider. Abecedare (talk) 02:14, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.