Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babbka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   A7/G11 by Thingg, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Babbka

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Rationale: This smells like a hoax; at the very least, it appears to be a non-notable film. It's probably also advertising, since the "Official Website" link on the Astriga page is to www.ashufilms.com, and the author is Ashurockstarboy. —Largo Plazo (talk) 09:54, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * By the author's own description of Astriga Film Industry, the "industry" is "popular in only ... three buildings and surrounding apartments". I've requested its deletion as a non-notable company (later note: it has been deleted).
 * This article provides only one reference, an external link to the home page of the Hindustan Times. There is no mention of the film Babbka at this location, nor does it turn up in a search of the site.
 * There is a list of award categories with no indication what the awarding organization is.
 * There are no Google hits for astriga babbka.
 * "The film was a huge commercial success and grossed $15 or Rs.300" is nonsense.

I am also nominating the following article for the same reason. In addition, it's a future film. —Largo Plazo (talk) 10:17, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete. WP:G11 and tagged as such. D ARTH P ANDA duel 13:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * OK, I tagged the other one for speedy as well.—Largo Plazo (talk) 13:58, 30 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete endorsed. WP:G11 --Pmedema (talk) 16:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.