Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babel enterprise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:42, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Babel enterprise

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article presents no evidence of notability, and I'm unconvinced that the product is actually notable. Certainly it's currently written like a very short advertorial in any case. Malleus Fatuorum 18:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete My searching is not turning up any significant independent coverage. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:08, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Search has failed to find anything like reliable independent references: not a single review, let alone independent discussion. No evidence of Notability in article or on web. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:35, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. A completely WP:Run-of-the-mill software product for which there is absolutely no evidence of notability as required by WP:GNG.  Poking through the Google searches, I could not find independent secondary sources.  Given the description (yawn) I was not surprised.  Msnicki (talk) 23:43, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as having been insufficient in-depth coverage by independent third-party sources. If links are added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:39, 9 December 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.