Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babu China, Pakistan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - inhabited places are inherently notable, as noted in WP:OUTCOMES and once again reiterated by the pile-on of WP:SNOW here. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 23:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Babu China, Pakistan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No content Vistro (talk) 05:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - It's a stub, but that is not the same as no content. It meets notability and verifiability requirements. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  06:12, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note - I would encourage the nominator to consider withdrawing the nomination and take a look at deletion policy WP:DELETE, or alternatively give a concrete reason why the article should be deleted. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  06:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep normal town stub. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 06:58, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Peregrine, though I suggest that sourcing everything on the page (flag, stats etc.) would be a smart move. Establishing notability of the town, rather than just through guidelines etc., would also be expedient! ╟─ Treasury Tag ► contribs ─╢ 09:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, why do you wanna delete every single thing btw?--hnnvansier (talk) 13:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. It has content and is a valid stub.  Wikipedia has not deadline.--Oakshade (talk) 22:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per everyone but the nominator. Edward321 (talk) 04:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.