Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babu Subramaniam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep.  Singu larity  01:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Babu Subramaniam

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I removed a prod because I think the article itself, in a way, asserts notability, purely because of where this person has worked. If I'm wrong, so be it...but better safe then sorry! Giggy Talk 02:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. I think he is unquestionably notable and really deserves a better article. If I had the time I would do it tonight. As is, I might get to it tomorrow. Plenty of ghits and easily sourced in my thinking. JodyByak, yak, yak 03:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd be happy to also do some work on it...just wanted consensus to see if it's worth it :) Giggy  Talk 04:49, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Such heavy involvement in such well-known and long-running television programs is notability for sure. It's not a great article as it stands, but I'd rather see the article on a Star Trek director improved than the article on a Star Trek character. Consequentially 08:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep, should never have been prodded. &mdash;Xezbeth 11:50, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: Well known, multiple-award winning director.   Ravenswing  18:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the above reasoning. --xDanielx Talk 23:09, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per above reasoning. Mathmo Talk 04:03, 9 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.