Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BabyCenter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 00:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

BabyCenter

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

WP:NN web site - failed prod because previous prod was mal-formed. (yes, I know) Toddst1 (talk) 06:36, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:10, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - no credible claim to notability for the company. A search for sources failed to find anything. Could almost be speedy deleted, but perhaps the article has existed for too long for that. --bonadea contributions talk 17:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:WEB and WP:GNG ... also, Alexa Internet is not a WP:RS. Happy Editing! &mdash;  21:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Per following sources:
 * And that's only page one. I'll shove these into the article's "Further reading" section for others to add if they got the time. Gary King  ( talk ) 01:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep above sources make it easily pass WP:GNG NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 01:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources found by Gary support notability. Inniverse (talk) 02:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sources found by Gary King. Codf1977 (talk) 07:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - many reliable sources exist covering the site, and it has received two notable awards (a Webby and a NII Award). Robofish (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * And that's only page one. I'll shove these into the article's "Further reading" section for others to add if they got the time. Gary King  ( talk ) 01:37, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep above sources make it easily pass WP:GNG NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 01:52, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources found by Gary support notability. Inniverse (talk) 02:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sources found by Gary King. Codf1977 (talk) 07:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - many reliable sources exist covering the site, and it has received two notable awards (a Webby and a NII Award). Robofish (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * Keep Sources found by Gary support notability. Inniverse (talk) 02:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Sources found by Gary King. Codf1977 (talk) 07:57, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - many reliable sources exist covering the site, and it has received two notable awards (a Webby and a NII Award). Robofish (talk) 21:28, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.