Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BabyTV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 03:28Z 

BabyTV

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged as spam, but not spam. On the other hand, evidence of notability and non-trivial independent coverage appears to be absent. Guy (Help!) 21:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete This being the 4th recreation of this article after 3 deletions by different admins. one deletion due to notability WP:CSD and two due to Spam WP:CSD . However if non-trivial independent coverage is added to establish notability I'll reconsider. --Hu12 21:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not exactly a run-of-the-mill service, but its case is not helped by the fact that there are two services (the other at babytv.com) of the same name, doing similar things.  Sadly, plugging babytv along with the name of its owner "Elite Sports" generates a total of 7 unique hits.  If someone can find something in print, I will tentatively take it at their word, and withdraw.  Chris cheese whine 01:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no notability shown Fotografico 04:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.