Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby & Hide


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Baby & Hide
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Delete looks to be a non-notable rockband, failing WP:MUSIC guidelines. JBsupreme ( talk ) 07:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete While GNews turns up more or less zilch for this act (a listing for an upcoming gig is all I found), the band (quoting WP:MUSIC) "has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels." The latter is the only reason I'm qualifying my "delete" with "weak." Their label, TEAM AV, has an article on Wikipedia, but I'm not sure that the article wouldn't be fodder for deletion in and of itself, and a GNews search on the label's name doesn't turn up much of anything. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡ  bomb  08:02, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:BAND. TEAM AV does have an article, but is unquestionably not a "major label or one of the more important indie labels", even by the absolute loosest interpretation. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.