Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby (MacLachlan novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:01, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Baby (MacLachlan novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

To be honest, I'm not too sure what this is supposed to be. It's an unreferenced 11 year old article about a 1995 novel that fails to establish the novel's notability. It looks like an IP editor added the big third paragraph in 2008, and it has remained that way since. With or without it, this article does not establish the book's notability. – numbermaniac  14:04, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. –  numbermaniac  14:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. –  numbermaniac  14:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep I found two reviews plus a mention on a best books for teaching. Given the age of the book I did have to find the reviews behind paywalls, but I have added citations for all three to the article and removed the poorly worded plot summary. This was not a complete search so more reviews might be out there. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:31, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Satisfies GNG and NBOOK with multiple book reviews. James500 (talk) 01:33, 29 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.