Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby Peach

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Merge to Princess Peach. Essjay ·  Talk 08:30, August 11, 2005 (UTC)

Baby Peach
The only information that can currently be placed in the article is what can be guessed by the name of the article (except for the game). A Link to the Past 19:43, August 2, 2005 (UTC)


 * Redirect and expand at Mario and Luigi 2. JDoorjam 19:53, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Princess Peach While we're at it, why are there separate articles for Baby Mario and Baby Luigi?  Shouldn't all these be merged with the main character's article?  Does every form a character takes deserve a separate article?  I think not.  --Bayyoc 19:56, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge per Bayyoc. --Several Times 19:59, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Because Baby Mario is constantly playable in games, and is noteworthy enough. We're not giving Carpenter Mario an article. -- A Link to the Past 20:07, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Okay. I don't want to get into a big argument about something as silly as Mario.  However, if Anakin Skywalker only deserves a soft redirect to Darth Vader, then Baby Mario should have no greater dignity.  But the issue isn't Baby Mario, it's Baby Peach. --Bayyoc 20:28, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Bayyoc. Jaxl 20:13, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect for now. But Baby Mario - who seems to be in a different continuity to Mario - is noteworthy enough for his own article. Sonic Mew | talk to me 21:31, August 2, 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect and expand at Mario and Luigi 2. &mdash; Linnwood (talk) [[Image:Flag of the United States.svg|25px]] 23:45, 2 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect and develop in the Princess Peach article. When there's information about her. Optichan 22:50, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page..