Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby and brother


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:46, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Baby and brother
Sounds like hogwash, but even if it's true, it's a defunct public access show. Even current public access shows are not encyclopedic. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverifiable and non-notable. No Ghits for "Baby and brother" bbt.  Reminds me of Articles for deletion/Gunk Land.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-24 03:42Z 
 * Delete public access shows are not notable, except Wayne's World. Ruby 04:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  Oh no  itsJamie Talk 21:29, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete public access = self-publication, nn. Carlossuarez46 22:04, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Latinus 00:02, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn --Zsinj 03:48, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. &mdash;This user has left wikipedia  15:59 2006-01-25
 * Delete Non-notable. --Brian1979 14:37, 28 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.