Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby born in air


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was nomination withdrawn. Canley (talk) 14:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Baby born in air

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a funny one - and if it gets deleted, a perfect WP:DAFT candidate. This should be a notable fact to include somewhere in the encyclopedia, but I don't think it deserves an individual article. h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge - but where? Try jus soli, jus sanguinis or citizenship. This and the "born at sea" question are matters on which Wikipedia should be giving a clear and definitive answer. -- Sgroupace (talk) 11:28, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Those look like decent possible places to merge this.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 11:35, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep As I stated in the debate about List of people born at sea, I think an article on this topic is certainly worthwhile as it has all sorts of legal and geopolitical ramifications, and can be very well referenced. The article title is now more sensible (Birth aboard aircraft and ships) and covers babies born in planes and at sea.--Canley (talk) 14:07, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Nom withdrawn per User:Uncle G's excellent work here. This should even be eligible for a WP:DYK inclusion now.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 14:15, 16 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.