Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby kissing

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was SPEEDY. jni 14:31, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Baby kissing
I had this tagged for speedy deletion, but the article creator removed the tag and added a VfD template. He's still busy playing around with the article, but it's simple vandalism (he's also been reverted elsewhere today). Rl 17:49, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Speedy Delete, In my opinion. Inter 18:31, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. User is also abusing VfD tag by removing it from page, editing text into it's frame, and so on. I fixed but will probably be changed again by abuser. Hedley 19:36, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. I put the speedy delete tag on an article of this title yesterday evening and I saw a bit later that it was deleted.    I then saw it rematerialize, and put the tag on it again.   If RI is saying that he also put the tag on it, that means either that the tag was removed or that someone created the article yet a third time.  --00:36, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)