Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby kissing (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

Baby kissing
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a dictionary definition. This article should be deleted. Marsbar8 (talk) 21:09, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Lackluster little stub of an article, but there seems to be a lot written on the topic. A historical overview from Mother Jones. One of the topics discussed in a Human Communications Research paper on communication in politics. The Atlantic's take on the topic is firmly tongue-in-cheek, but it points to older print sources that maybe productive. Other sources discuss its use in more metaphorical terms. Broadly, I think there's an article to be had here, even if we don't have it here yet. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 21:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. It is a stub and definitely needs expansion to move beyond the dictionary definition. But expansion is possible, so let's not discourage it just yet.  → Michael J Ⓣ Ⓒ Ⓜ 23:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - once notable, then it's always notable. Even Martin Van Buren and Vladimir Putin were caught doing it. Bearian (talk) 21:56, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.