Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baby mugging


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Forced perspective. Supernerd's suggestion seems sensible. No prejudice against re-targeting or opening an RfD. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:45, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Baby mugging

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Extremely limited content, little to no chance of expansion. Fails to pass 4 and 8 - The article, the link from from Internet Phenomena, and all of the source references, except for the Daily Mail, mentioned the creator by name with references to their website. The articles overall tone is that of a free plug for the bloggers website, or tiny bio. Sawta (talk) 00:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Had a look at the article and "stupid" is the gentlest way to describe it. Wikipedia is not the place to parade every half-assed Internet meme. sixty nine   • speak up •  04:08, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I almost want to say redirect to Depth of field in the hopes that it might help somebody out, but the kindest result would be delete. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 09:58, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete as soon as possible. Reads like an advert.WP:WWIN SW3 5DL (talk) 16:39, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into forced perspective. This does lack depth, but notability still seems to be established enough to be worth a mention as a bit part. Forced perspective is probably better than depth of field, since the former already has a list of minor uses. (Disclaimer: I'm the one who created the article in contention) Supernerd11 Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 22:05, 19 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.