Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babysitters (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

Babysitters (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:NFILM and significant RS coverage not found. Awards are not significant. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Every morning   (there's a halo...)  23:27, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:45, 11 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't want to say "per nom," but the nominator's assessment is correct here. Babysitters fails WP:NFILM. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Hardly a film based only on sexual performances pass in WP:NFILM, in this case the characters do not have at least name.Guilherme Burn (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as no evidence of notability, Hasnt won any notable award,s Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 17:52, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NFILM with no reviews in reliable sources, only in niche adult video sources Atlantic306 (talk) 18:45, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete  - this is hardly an informative article, as it does not say much about the film other than listing the cast. Vorbee (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.