Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bac u kry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep as per consensus and the absence of deletion requests outside of the nominator. Non-admin closure. Warrah (talk) 00:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Bac u kry

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )


 * It looks like this article fails WP:N. It is here for a while, but still it's relevance is questionable. Also, user who create this article is also questionable, as multiple other articles by him has already been deleted. Wikipedia is not propaganda. --Tadija (talk) 19:26, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kosovo-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep -It was featured on The Guardian (here).  kedadi al  23:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * well, if Guardian writes about it, then Wikipedia should also? Wikipedia have it's own rules, and should not follow guardian ones. --Tadija (talk)


 * I gave you The Guardian article for notability, otherwise "Bac u kry" slogan was the main theme of the celebration on the day of independence.  kedadi al  11:04, 11 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia's rules are precisely that we follow the judgement of reliable sources such as The Guardian. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment "Also, user who create this article is also questionable, as multiple other articles by him has already been deleted." -Do you have any proof for such claims?  kedadi al  23:24, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This (User talk:Ardijusufi), and per Deleted Contributions.--Tadija (talk) 13:10, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * An article stands and falls on it's own merits, not those of the creator or any editor. Usrnme h8er (talk · contribs) 16:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:46, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep: Seems to be notable in the international press - Guardian, UK, Der Tagesspiegel, Germany , Gazzetta di Parma, Italy , Hoy, Spain , e.novine, Serbia . -- Boing!   said Zebedee  14:11, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep notability established per above (GregJackP (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2010 (UTC))
 * Keep. Notability seems to be established, though a bit thin for my taste - I'd like to see more. As to the good faith (or otherwise) of the author, obvious bad faith articles would be dealt with through the Speedy Deletion process. The presence of multiple speedy deletion warnings from months ago is not of particular relevance to this article, especially when one of those warnings was for this article in September 2009 - at which time the speedy deletion was declined. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 12:54, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.