Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachchan family


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. The "delete" !voters fail to present a valid argument. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Bachchan family

 * – ( View AfD View log )

there is no need for such small article on the family, each member has his own page-a huge one- this page is not adding anything useful, so everything written in it could easily be added to personal life section of each member, furthermore, it's a family of 4 actors-unlike the Kapoor family, which is huge. Meryam90 (talk) 03:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 05:13, 25 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 00:19, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment Is there a reason given here for deletion?  If not, IMO this AfD should have been closed under WP:Speedy keep reason #1, not relisted.  Also, I don't agree that the reason given is even a problem, c.f. Warburton family.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:27, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions states, "While merely citing a policy or guideline may give other editors a clue as to what the reasoning is, it does not explain specifically how the policy applies to the discussion at hand. When asserting that an article should be deleted, it is important to explain why." Unscintillating (talk) 21:46, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - as proposer. aηsuмaη   ༽Ϟ  18:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.