Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bachhowal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Another bad faith blatant WP:REVENGE nom by the same editor hence I am also going to close this one immediately. (non-admin closure) Celestina007 (talk) 15:01, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Bachhowal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of page Bachhowal is


 * 1. Not notable
 * 2. Doesn't have independent verifiable 3rd party citations
 * 3. Contains almost all Original research — Preceding unsigned comment added by LwdBell (talk • contribs) 12:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep in accordance with WP:GEOLAND.--Mvqr (talk) 13:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep this is obviously a bad faith nom (and a revenge nom) but has no basis in policy. Praxidicae (talk) 13:26, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Praxidicae. — Blablubbs (talk • contribs) 14:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 September 18.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:46, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep per above. Qualifies WP:GEOLAND. --Ab207 (talk) 14:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep A village article don't need to delete. Priyanjali singh (talk) 14:57, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.