Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back To Home


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 01:08, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Back To Home

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An article by a WP:SPA account who in one edit summary appears to self-identify as the author. User:Narutolovehinata5 placed a Prod notice: "Unremarkable book lacking coverage in reliable sources." but it was removed by the article creator. I agree with the Prod rationale, as searches are turning up nothing on this book, hence a clear fail of WP:NBOOK but we lack speedy-deletion criteria for creative works, so I am bringing this to AfD. AllyD (talk) 06:49, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and my original PROD. It doesn't help that searching for it results in nothing but false positives. If only A7 could apply to books. Could potentially qualify as G11 if the article creator is confirmed to be the author. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 07:11, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:01, 19 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. I couldn't find anything to suggest that this book is as notable as the article claims it is. There is the possibility of coverage being only in a foreign language, but usually there's something out there to back up the claims in English and I can't really find anything. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:00, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, does not meet WP:GNG. A google search brings up nothing, ditto for the author (lots of websites have misspelled based for bassed:)).  Could a nice Administrator please speedy delete this as it is obviously WP:PROMOTION; WP:G11 perhaps? Coolabahapple (talk) 13:02, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks coverage could not find anything and the book fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:04, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.