Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back n da Hood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  kur  ykh   07:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Back n da Hood

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Future albums are not notable without significant coverage in independent reliable sources. See WP:MUSIC. SummerPhD (talk) 05:59, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. All it needs is some sources. Me and Esanchez could probally find some. Coolman1250 (talk) 21:56, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 06:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreleased album with little or no media coverage of substance. Fails WP:NALBUM. TheJazzDalek (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I can't find any references that satisfy WP:NALBUM. Given that it has been a week with no changes to the article, I assume Coolman and Esanchez haven't found any either. PDCook (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.