Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back on My Feet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) RadioFan (talk) 16:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Back on My Feet

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article, authored by, just appears to be a random non-profit organization that is trying to use Wikipedia as a ways to promote themselves. Other than the references to the official website of the organization, none of the other references are live and if anything, there has not been any further coverage since the initial writing.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 00:16, 10 February 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 07:37, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Some of the reference links seem to be broken, but the group is verifiable and does seem to have received substantial press coverage. Here's a copy of the Times-Colonist article: http://www.homelessnation.org/en/citynews/Victoria?page=2 (search for "Jody Paterson"). Pburka (talk) 01:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The article has had a lot of coverage, and even if the coverage isn't recent, notability is not temporary. The article was created by an editor with a conflict of interest, but that editor has been indefinitely blocked so I don't think there should be any concerns. --  At am a  頭 01:08, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Sufficient 3rd party sources exist to demonstrate notability here RadioFan (talk) 13:20, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - other than the spam, which I removed, I don't see a problem with it. It is well sourced and appears to be notable, even if I've never heard of it. Bearian (talk) 22:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.