Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BackupBluRay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus to delete. Merge or keep as a standalone article is unclear. W.marsh 19:52, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

BackupBluRay

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Should technically be merged with BackupHDDVD, but seeing as how there's almost nothing in BackupBluRay, you might as well delete it outright. Noclip 14:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * merge and redirect ILovePlankton(L—n) 18:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Can we get an expert's opinion? Bearian 19:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Citi Cat   ♫  03:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep I would ere on the side of keep for this one. In all probabilities there will be a law suit of something about this software. But an expert in the field needs to have a crack at rewriting it. Fosnez 08:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep This piece of software created quite a bit of publicity in the media at the time and is therefor notable. A merge with BackupHDDVD wouldn't be the best solution, as they may be from the same developer and have similar names and function in similar ways, but effectively they are different pieces of software. It would be like merging tea and coffee... The only possible merge I could think of is merging all related article into the Muslix64 article. Poeloq 11:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Merge If BackupBluray was expanded, much of the content would be identical to the BackupHDDVD article. In fact, I could copy most of the BackupHDDVD article, replace "HD-DVD" with "Blu-ray" and use that as the BackupBluray article. To avoid such duplication, I think the articles should be merged. However, I think the merged article should be called BackupHDDVD/BackupBluray, to stress that we're talking about two different programs. — Ksero 10:44, 15 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.