Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BackupRight


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was sp e edy delete, it's snowing in here. east. 718 at 02:14, November 24, 2007

BackupRight

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article fails WP:NOTABILITY. Advert Hu12 (talk) 00:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete: Does not meet WP:N. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)a
 * Delete per nom.   jj137  ( Talk ) 02:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Looks like advertising to me. Andante1980 (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 09:06, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: Definitely an advert. N b u r d e n  (T) 09:21, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, WP:CSD G11, obvious spam. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Of the three references in the 'Press' section, the first two look like adverts, the third is not enough for notability. Snigbrook (talk) 00:13, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Obvious spam; NN. Jmlk  1  7  01:34, 24 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.