Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backup Direct (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:40, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Backup Direct
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ineligible for PROD - was PROD'd then immediately de-PROD'd by the same person in 2012. Someone apparently representing the company tried to tag the page for speedy twice in March this year, saying the company is no longer trading.

I can't find any sources to indicate this passes WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. Most of what I've found have been routine press releases that do not pass WP:CORPDEPTH. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 16:41, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 17:03, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as corporate spam. This content belongs on the company web site, not here. Surprisingly closed as "Keep" at the first AfD; just shows how Wikipedia guidelines have evolved. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:37, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: per WP:PROMO. Might even meet WP:G11.  As with, I cannot see how this survived an AfD.    Dr Strauss   talk   16:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.