Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backwards Man


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  Citi Cat   ♫ 02:45, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Backwards Man

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

It's just one scene of a movie. Not worthy of its own article. DodgerOfZion 16:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I personally believe Backwards Man is notable enough to have his own article. Most Internet memes atleast get a mention in the article they pertain to, and they haven't appeared in a theatrically-released film. At the very least, the Backwards Man article deserves a merge with Freddy Got Fingered with its own section. EctoplasmOnToast 17:08, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Other than a few references to the movie here and there, I don't see how it's notable at all. It's not a meme, just a particular part of a controversial movie. DodgerOfZion


 * By all means delete; not even barely notable on its own. If some fan so desires, he will merge some of it in the main article. --Goochelaar 17:42, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * eleteD. .mlif eht fo txetnoc eht ni neve elbaton yleraB .TCIF:PW sliaF --Dhartung | Talk 18:02, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * ?uoy dluoc ,tsiser t'ndluoc tsuj uoY Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 18:11, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * .NDOAJB:PW ni tup ot hguone yhtrow s'taht ,yhW tnemmoC DodgerOfZion
 * You are aware that BJAODN is dead, right? Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 19:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I am now... It's a pity. DodgerOfZion


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.