Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backyard Farms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   procedural close, kept, nom was by likely and now-blocked sockpuppet. Gwen Gale (talk) 14:36, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Backyard Farms

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Obscure company, no reason given why it merits an article, and spam. Ocean Mystic Researcher (talk) 03:23, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment by indefinitely blocked sockpuppet stricken. NW ( Talk ) 12:52, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Company written up in New York Times. Must not be quite as "obscure" as nominator presumes. Stub will benefit from expansion, not deletion.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 06:59, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like a run of the mill vegetable producer with no assertion of notability given. AniMate  07:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.