Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacon Buertoen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. – Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:13, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

Bacon Buertoen
Original research. Unverifiable. Only two google hits, both of which refer to wikipedia. Looks like a neologism dreamed up by a group of IRC buddies : see The JPS 17:13, 9 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Merge, hilarious, but written in an very-NOPV-type manner, with proper links even. Merge it with Bacon, Pork, or someother related food article.-MegamanZero 17:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Why merge? There is no evidence that this actually exists?! The JPS 18:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If no info can be located to back up the article, then delete. Still very funny, however.-MegamanZero 18:16, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Just because search engines cannot find information about it, doesn't mean it does not exist. M3Plus 02:47, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, the Bacon Buertoen, a truly lip-smacking delicacy from what i've heard. I thank the originator. GeneralManager 03:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Sockpuppet alert! I've had dealings with this user on another article, and I have evidence of sockpuppettry. Expect random people without accounts to suddenly pop up out of nowhere. The JPS 10:12, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This sockpuppetry is not true, I am not the same person as other people. M3Plus 02:33, 16 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete either a hoax or a non-notable recipe. Either way, not encyclopedic. Durova 18:14, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN, clearly. &mdash;  F REAK OF N URxTURE  ( TALK )  19:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN Bart133 01:45, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * BJAODN per Freakofnurture. Stifle 00:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.