Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baconnaise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep by WP:SNOW. Article was also on the front page. Elle vécut heureuse à jamais  (be free) 11:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Baconnaise

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Advertising. While "Baconnise" has all the Wikipedic bells and whistles, it's a slim entry puffed up with unrelated material about the company itself and celebrity anecdotes. The article reads like a promotional piece for the product. Alternative: trim to a brief few sentences and merge with Mayonnaise. MonicaDerm (talk) 08:42, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose. Odd - this article made it through the DYK process.  MonicaDerm created her account today and has made one contribution - this AFD (see this).  I'm looking for a speedy close here under WP:SNOW. Shem (talk) 09:12, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The product is notable enough, having appeared on major shows.  The mere fact that this is a commercial product is no reason for deletion.  The article is sufficiently encyclopedic, well sourced, with legitimate references, hardly an advertisement.  I find the AfD groundless. Freederick (talk) 09:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. The product has had enough media exposure to meet all the notability criteria. McMarcoP (talk) 10:19, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.