Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BadVolf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

BadVolf

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. References either are in passing or do not mention article subject. red dogsix (talk) 19:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  19:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  19:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions.  /wiae   /tlk  19:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - Identified as the antagonist ("BadWolf") in three of the article's sources:, , ~Kvng (talk) 20:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: A related AFD is at Articles for deletion/John M. Dougan red dogsix (talk) 21:29, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: A related AFD is at Articles for deletion/PBSOTalk red dogsix (talk) 21:28, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Lack of significant coverage by reliable third parties. Just being in the story isn't significant coverage. The event is getting coverage, not the person. BLP1E may apply too. (Additionally, those 3 sources are 1 RS, 1 questionable source and one that clearly doesn't pass RS.) Niteshift36 (talk) 22:19, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. BLP One E; the sources are not enough to support a BLP DGG ( talk ) 05:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti <sup style="color:green; font-family:Times;">Talk  16:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete and I had planned to comment to sooner, none of this suggests satisfying the applicable notability and this all seems to be part of one event for the hackings. SwisterTwister   talk  05:08, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.