Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Boy (Gobots)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Bad Boy (Gobots)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Topic seems non-notable. Please delete. NotARealWord (talk) 13:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The article is fine and detailed. Mathewignash (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - "Article is good" is not a valid argument for keeping. NotARealWord (talk) 14:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Can see nothinig in the artciel that establishess notability.Slatersteven (talk) 14:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no real sources, no evidence of real world notability. The article is not "fine and detailed", it's filled with irrelevant in-universe cruft. J Milburn (talk) 19:09, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep A toy, a reoccurring character on a notable show, and he crossed over from the Go-Bots to the Transformers universe.   D r e a m Focus  23:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * So? Do you have any reliable sources discussing the subject? Any evidence of real-world significance? J Milburn (talk) 23:08, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per J Milburn Secret account 02:14, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of real-world notability. Black Kite (t) (c) 13:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for rescue by the Article Rescue Squadron, with no explanation as to why this article should be rescued and how that could happen (per ARS instructions).    Snotty Wong   confess 15:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per lack of sources which establish the notability of the subject.   Snotty Wong   confess 15:46, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Centralize discussion and merge and redirect as accordingly decided by Articles for deletion/Transformers centralized discussion. There are so many articles, surely some of them can be lumped. — Code  Hydro  13:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG, no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Claritas § 16:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree entirely with JMilburn and Claritas. It is not enough to vaguely point at various TV episodes and go "It's notable because it's on TV!" Reyk  YO!  19:28, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete not even notable inside the Go-Bots show, let alone any real-world notability. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The only coverage is about the toy line, and that isn't significant. Nowhere near meeting the notability guidelines. Alzarian16 (talk) 12:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or Merge and redirect to Gobots pursuant to the guidelines for elements within a notable fictional work listed at Notability (fiction). This is a recurring character that has at least two toys modeled after him. No need to destroy the article or its history as the character may become more significant with future Gobots and Transformer projects. Inniverse (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep The actual choice is between merge and keep; it seems to me there would be good reason for being consistent, and some of the other articles are clear keeps.  .    DGG ( talk ) 02:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS? J Milburn (talk) 10:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence to WP:verify notability as a toy or as a TV character. Shooterwalker (talk) 21:33, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.