Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Karma (EP)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus consider meeting WP:NALBUM C2 sufficient at this time. (non-admin closure) ~ Aseleste  (t, e &#124; c, l) 04:31, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Bad Karma (EP)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable sources, and a WP:BEFORE search found nothing of use. versacespace talk to me  00:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  versacespace  talk to me  00:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - It made the Billboard charts, which is backed up by references to the Billboard site, so that satisfies criterion #2 at WP:NALBUM. However it seems to have gotten no reliable and professional reviews or other useful coverage. If kept, the article needs to be cleaned up with useless Twitter and YouTube sources removed. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 01:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The charts could be added to the discograpy. Article is fuly based on twitter and Youtube sources, nothing else. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Aside from charting on Billboard, I found a few reliable sources which talk about the EP:, and . With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 15:59, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * ref 1 is a student news site, ref 2 is ok, ref 3 is an interview. 1 and 3 do not establish notability. versacespace  talk to me  16:07, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:29, 7 April 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. There isn't much here that's reliably sourced other than the chart positions. Only one of these is included in the article on the artist, so unless something more substantial can be found to justify an article, perhaps merging there by adding these chart placings would suffice. --Michig (talk) 09:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Meets WP:NALBUM with sources presented by Doomsdayer and Astig. They're reliable enough IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 01:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~Swarm~  {sting} 03:22, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:NALBUM #2 due to appearing on the Billboard charts. SailingInABathTub (talk) 14:43, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep, Current status meets WP:NALBUM as per above. Articuno appears (talk) 12:38, 22 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.