Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Religion/Brian Baker Interview

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Postdlf 23:35, 19 July 2005 (UTC)

Bad Religion/Brian Baker Interview
Text dump of an interview; not encyclopedic. tregoweth 03:18, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Has no context whatsoever. Gwk 03:19, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As per above. royblumy 05:05, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not encyclopedic. jni 05:58, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not encyclopedic. JamesBurns 08:22, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Check the "what links here". It's not meant to be an article, hence it being on the subpage. It's a piece of text used in a discussion on Talk:Bad Religion posted by User:Irishpunktom just yesterday. Maybe it needs userfying or moving to a sub of the talk, but I should definitely be kept in some form. - Mgm|(talk) 08:36, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: The main namespace doesn't have subpages. For example, AC/DC is not a subpage of AC. As R. fiend mentions below, it still appears in Special:Random. —Markaci 2005-07-14 T 03:24:07 Z
 * Delete wikipedia is not a webhost, mabye wikisource would have it?--nixie 08:38, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or transwiki to wikisource -- Francs2000 | Talk [[Image:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg|25px| ]] 20:21, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not for wikipedia anyway. And sub-pages are still pages. They still come up in "random page", for instance. -R. fiend 16:02, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Just Move it - I left it there as a reference so as people could see. It was never intended to be an article in it's own right.  Considering I conducted the interview, would I be right in thinking that any edit i made based on it could be considered Origianl Research ?
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.