Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 03:37, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Bad art

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No concise definition, nor anything much more than OR. Jmlk 1  7  08:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree that this appears to be original research. JavaTenor 08:31, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Some people do study and collect "bad art", usually referring to amateur art found in thrift shops and such. There have been books devoted to the subject (ISBN 0836221850), and real brick-and-mortar bad-art museums exist on at least 3 continents.  I'm inclined to say this could be a real article someday, although the fact that it's been this bad since 2004 makes cleanup anytime soon unlikely.  So I say delete it for now and a new article can be built from scratch someday... perhaps I'll even do one myself, time permitting. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:33, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Although it should include "canvasses that are one solid color, or just say the word 'oof'." ;) At any rate, its a POV topic, and will almost always be OR. i said 00:43, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Not a proper disambiguation page. "Bad as Art" is the name of a Gallery, by the way. Bearian 21:39, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.