Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad ass babes: The movie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is very clearly to delete this article. Relisting was not necessary or appropriate. Nick (talk) 14:23, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

Bad ass babes: The movie

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable movie.  Java Hurricane  02:41, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 02:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: None of these are valid arguments.
 * Delete as non-notable. --Lockley (talk) 20:48, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable + bad spelling all around. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 12:32, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 02:03, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFILM. No sources have been provided other than the production company's website. (Incidentally, I question the relisting. Nobody has even requested a keep, much less asserted notability for this film.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 07:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete There seem to be few reliable sources covering the film, not enough to pass NFILM. I found 'reviews' here (seems to be unreliable) HorrorNews net (seems to be reliable) here (seems unreliable), a user review (not reliable). The only one of those accepted for establishing notability is HNN (horrornews.net). If another reliable review could be found, that might push it into the realm of being notable, though I still feel not over the bar. NFILM doesn't just want indication that the film was reviewed twice, it wants indication that the film is " widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics", and I don't see that being met here. Best, Eddie891 Talk Work 12:09, 4 July 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.