Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad beat (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   snowball keep. No consensus to delete. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy5  ( talk ) 01:24, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Bad beat
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This term does not appear to be notable. While it is clearly used, as seen by the two external links that use it, there is nothing to provide notability for this term itself. seresin (public computer)  22:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. No rationale for deletion listed since multiple assertions of natability are plainly stated in the article, there are 597,000 google hits, and the article is properly sourced. 2005 (talk) 22:07, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. No actual rationale given for deletion. Croctotheface (talk) 22:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Seems to me that lack of notability was given as a deletion reason.-- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  23:41, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * When the rationale for deletion simultaneously acknowledges that there exist sources about the subject, I don't really see how there's a non-notability argument there. Croctotheface (talk) 03:24, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I did not acknowledge that there are sources about the subject. I said there were sources that use the term. Two very different things. seresin (public computer)  20:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, ok, then I'd suggest looking at this Google news search to find a bunch of sources about the concept of bad beats. Croctotheface (talk) 20:11, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Obviously notable. Rray (talk) 23:42, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Please provide some evidence for this assertion. seresin (public computer)  20:00, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep the term is highly notable. Hobit (talk) 03:04, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I think it would take a Bad beat to delete this one. Two Speedy Keeps and a Keep on the flop, a Keep on the turn, and I'll throw in a Keep on the river. Let's WP:SNOW this one. Eauhomme (talk) 05:47, 26 June 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.