Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad egg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to bad egg. While this article itself has not appear to pass GNG and lacks sources, it could be a viable search term for bad egg. I would be open to the redirect being reverted (soft redirect) if reliable sourcing can be provided/found in order to satisfactorily prove its notability. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Bad egg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not verifiable; I find a cito-genesis middle-school student paper, and a Google Book result about a game of this name with entirely different rules. The primary topic here is probably rotten egg. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 05:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 05:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 05:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Agreed. No reliable sources available for the children's game. More sources available for bad eggs in Pokemon. Fails WP:GNG. Perhaps a soft Redirect to bad egg could work here?  Lourdes  15:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.