Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badass Game

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 19:31, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

Badass Game
Looks like vanity article about non-notable "game." tregoweth 09:59, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - It was created and editd by a single user, possibly in effort advertise the game. &mdash;Kjammer 11:06, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - Referenced in an Eyedea song (unsigned edit by 66.9.126.26))
 * Keep - Refers to actual unsolved problem in game theory. Agree with user on discussion page that the theory section must be cleaned up.  Perhaps a language warning as well? User:DiceDiceBaby
 * User ID created today. RickK 04:19, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete It doesn't even qualify as a game. --Xcali 16:40, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article does not establish notability. Gamaliel 16:42, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Way to reference my (yes, I take ownership of it) Eyedea article... but I'm not so sure you're right about him referencing it. Which song?  My vote is conditional on this statement by the unsigned user being true and on the theory section being cleaned up.  The amateur graphics don't help.  Xcali is wrong, though, it does qualify as a game - not a board game or video game, but a game theory exercise, like the Prisoner's Dilemma.216.158.31.195 16:55, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * delete unless references are given to appropriate peer-reviewed journals, or atleast somebody with a proper academic post is revealed to behind the experiment, and with the intention of publishing it somewhere. It hardly seems to be akin to Axelrod and Hamilton. Dunc|&#9786; 18:10, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * In its current form, delete as original research. --Tabor 18:17, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Really interesting, but would need massive rewrite 130.58.218.6 18:21, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. NeoJustin 02:05, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, sock puppet limit has been reached. RickK 04:19, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable & original research. JamesBurns 04:52, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Hey everybody. I'm really sorry.  I just wanted to help out and write some articles for the magazine about comedy and music and things I found interesting.  I'm sorry I pissed everybody off and I promise to never come back.
 * Keep maybe it's non-notable but the game looks really interesting!  Grue   13:10, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .