Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badia Spices


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Star  Mississippi  23:18, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Badia Spices

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:COMPANY with very little media coverage. Clarityfiend (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies,  and Florida. AllyD (talk) 07:43, 4 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: The Miami Herald profile more than qualifies as WP:SIGCOV on its own. (It seems to have been a major print feature.) The Sun-Sentinel article seems reliable; the back half of it is non-routine and also mentions a previous feature of the company. Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:54, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Agreed with the assessment of the coverage in the article. This is certainly a notable company. Etzedek24 (I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record) 06:36, 5 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article sucks! However, there are lots of sources at newspapers.com and elsewhere. I was going to clip some to add some to the article but recent "improvements" at the wikipedia library are giving me fits. In any case, this is a case of a very poorly written, poorly sourced article, but it doesn't have to be, the sources exist, we just need to improve the article rather than delete it.Jacona (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.