Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badlands (Swedish musical act)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Michig (talk) 06:37, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Badlands (Swedish musical act)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Completely unsourced WP:BLP of a musician, making no claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC for anything more than the fact of her existence. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which a musician automatically gets to have an article just because she exists -- reliable source coverage, supporting a claim that satisfies WP:NMUSIC, must be present for her to earn one. Also WP:COI, as the article was created by her own record label. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your input Bearcat. Sorces now added, all new to this and all under construction. Regards RITElabel (talk)RITElabel —Preceding undated comment added 10:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)  — RITElabel (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * User:RITElabel is a role account of the singer's record label, and has been blocked. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  16:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - Despite the COI involvement, there seems to be a credible assertion of notability, if the article is re-written. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  20:55, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete at best for now and Draft if needed as the current article and coverage is still questionable. SwisterTwister   talk  05:12, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  05:13, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep no questionable sources --Selinsandy (talk) 14:36, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  01:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - there are sources up to and including Dagens Nyheter, a major national daily newspaper. I had a look at other Swedish sources and there seem to be plenty available. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Looks legit Jigglypuff 109 (talk) 20:15, 7 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.