Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badmarsh & Shri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Per WP:SK, the nomination is a banned contribution. No one has seconded deletion, so this discussion is speedily closed. (non-admin closure) Michaelzeng7 (talk) 01:34, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Badmarsh & Shri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article fails WP:BAND/GNG, warning tag present for 5 years with no corrective action. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and. Unscintillating (talk) 13:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)]
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. I agree that the article needs to include some references, but there's plenty of coverage in reliable sources to show that WP:GNG and WP:BAND are met, as a WP:BEFORE search would've revealed. Examples are:   . Thanks.  — sparklism  hey! 06:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per sources found by Sparklism. Passes GNG/BAND. --Michig (talk) 07:17, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy close, speedy keep: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for sock puppetry per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Crtew (talk) 15:35, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: Removed nominator's vote inside of nomination. Crtew (talk) 15:50, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * WP:SK 2a The closer should keep in mind the large number of nominations made on a large, diverse set of articles that the nominator made on the same day.Crtew (talk) 05:35, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.