Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badminton at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games – Qualification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify.‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Courcelles (talk) 13:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Badminton at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games – Qualification

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Contested drafting, so no other choice but to bring it here. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sports, Caribbean,  and El Salvador. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:51, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Badminton, Barbados, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Jamaica, Mexico, Trinidad and Tobago,  and Venezuela.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: See also Articles for deletion/Basketball at the 2023 Central American and Caribbean Games – Qualification. --NoonIcarus (talk) 10:23, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftifying would be the best decision here as per what I feel, because this tournament is upcoming and most probably will get the much needed coverage in future, being an important tournament in Badminton Pan Am. zoglophie 17:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete just a results listing not covered in independent sources. LibStar (talk) 07:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep It is not possible to select 2 sports out of a bunch of sports and iscuss only these 2, whilst the others are kept. Florentyna (talk) 14:44, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:OTHERSTUFF. Also you have not demonstrated how this topic meets a notability guideline. LibStar (talk) 15:06, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * (vote below) Agree that it is an invalid comment. Timothytyy (talk) 12:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftifying would be a good choice. However I doubt that this will ever meet GNG, so I won't oppose deletion. Timothytyy (talk) 12:58, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - I am also sceptical about whether this article will ever meet GNG but I see no harm in it staying in draft so people can work on it and potentially reintroduce the article if the event ever does gain the required coverage. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The problem is the drafting of this article has been met with resistance. Would a drafting decision here stand? If so, I would also support drafting. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I do share this concern with you. If someone disruptively moves it back without addressing the concerns of this AfD, it can always be pushed back to draft space, reinforcing the AfD consensus, with a view to WP:SALT if people can't resist the temptation. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:50, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.