Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badran Roy Badran


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was The result was speedily deleted as a copyright violation. Lady of  Shalott  06:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Badran Roy Badran

 * – ( View AfD View log )

BLP violation with multiple unadressable issues. My WP:BEFORE shows this individual as not having sourcable notability and thus failing both WP:FILMMAKER and WP:GNG. With respects, he's barely verifiable.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions.  — Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:51, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:54, 22 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Google search indicates no sources which would go to notability. Also, Celine Abiad, which was written by the same editor, has precisely the same problems, and should be deleted as well. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:21, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete ASAP as a copyright violation of this. In addition, if Michael Q. Schmidt has concluded that he's not notable, then he's definitely not notable.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  01:50, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Relevant discussion with the editor who created this article can be found here. Beyond My Ken (talk) 18:44, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * As nominator and per the linked discussion, I am not adverse to this be userfied... just so long as the author understands WP:COI and our requirement for WP:V and WP:RS, and imporantly that this is not stored unimproved in his userspace indefinitely.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, I agree with MQS's conditions regarding userfication, with the additional caveat that any copyright violation in the article be removed or cleared up via OTRS before userfication. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.