Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baelnorn (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – sgeureka t•c 09:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Baelnorn
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article fails to establish notability, lacking any non-primary sources. TTN (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minecrafter0271 (talk • contribs) 18:36, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 18:27, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - The previous AFD from the old days of 2007 resulted in a keep based on the argument that the creature appears in D&D rulebooks and novels, or based on the idea that there might be additional references. The former, of course, is completely invalid for establishing notability, and the latter turned out to be not true.  There is no coverage in reliable, secondary sources that establish any kind of notability for this minor fictional creature, so it is a complete failure of the WP:GNG.  Rorshacma (talk) 19:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable with primary sources, as reflected in the sparse activity on the article following its 2007 AfD nom. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  05:19, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:25, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Lacks sufficient RS to pass the GNG. Chetsford (talk) 02:20, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.