Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bagels and Brownies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 06:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Bagels and Brownies

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Company lacks the depth of coverage required by WP:CORP to indicate notability. Catfish Jim  &#38; the soapdish  08:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The article is an almost-worthless stub, but the company has gotten some substantial coverage, like this in the Business Standard, this in the Calcutta Telegraph, and this from the Times of India (or possibly a Times blog). --MelanieN (talk) 22:37, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep I think that based on the additional sources noted by MelanieN, this is well within the notability requirements. The article itself needs a lot of work, but should not be deleted.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by SBHans13 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
 * On reading the additional articles, I would tend to agree. Catfish Jim   &#38; the soapdish  18:44, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Baseball   Watcher  02:05, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep Article has improved. Given Nom's comment above, I would suggest he withdraw nomination in order to move things along. Wickedjacob (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.